Sep 16 – 20, 2024
Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics
America/Toronto timezone

Contribution List

65 out of 65 displayed
  1. 9/16/24, 9:00 AM
    Conference Event
  2. Robert Spekkens (Perimeter Institute)
    9/16/24, 9:20 AM
    Tutorial

    Can the effectiveness of a medical treatment be determined without the expense of a randomized controlled trial? Can the impact of a new policy be disentangled from other factors that happen to vary at the same time? Questions such as these are the purview of the field of causal inference, a general-purpose science of cause and effect, applicable in domains ranging from epidemiology to...

    Go to contribution page
  3. Thomas Richardson (University of Washington)
    9/16/24, 10:50 AM
    Conference Talk

    In the Statistics literature there are three main frameworks for causal modeling: counterfactuals (aka potential outcomes), non-parametric structural equation models (NPSEMs) and graphs (aka path diagrams or causal Bayes nets). These approaches are similar and, in certain specific respects, equivalent. However, there are important conceptual differences and each formulation has its own...

    Go to contribution page
  4. Joris M. Mooij (University of Amsterdam)
    9/16/24, 11:30 AM
    Conference Talk

    Based on the immense popularity of causal Bayesian networks and structural causal models, one might expect that these representations are appropriate to describe the causal semantics of any real-world system, at least in principle. In this talk, I will argue that this is not the case, and motivate the study of more general causal modeling frameworks. In particular, I will discuss bipartite...

    Go to contribution page
  5. Leihao Chen (University of Amsterdam, Korteweg-de Vries Institute for Mathematics)
    9/16/24, 1:45 PM
    Contributed Talk
  6. Yìlè Yīng (Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics)
    9/16/24, 1:45 PM
    Contributed Talk
  7. V. Vilasini (ETH Zürich and Inria University Grenoble Alpes)
    9/16/24, 2:10 PM
    Contributed Talk
  8. Trung Phung (Johns Hopkins Whiting School of Engineering)
    9/16/24, 2:10 PM
    Contributed Talk
  9. Nick Ormrod (University of Oxford)
    9/16/24, 2:35 PM
    Contributed Talk
  10. Shashaank Khanna (University of York)
    9/16/24, 2:35 PM
    Contributed Talk
  11. Pablo Arrighi (Université Paris-Sarclay and Inria)
    9/16/24, 3:45 PM
    Flash Talk
  12. Victor Gitton (ETH Zurich)
    9/16/24, 3:52 PM
    Flash Talk
  13. Julian Wechs (Université Libre de Bruxelles)
    9/16/24, 3:59 PM
    Flash Talk
  14. Ryszard Paweł Kostecki (University of Gdańsk)
    9/16/24, 4:06 PM
    Flash Talk
  15. Marina Maciel Ansanelli (Perimeter Institute)
    9/16/24, 4:13 PM
    Flash Talk
  16. Charles Alexandre Bédard (Università della Svizzera Italiana)
    9/16/24, 4:20 PM
    Flash Talk
  17. Alastair Abbott (Inria Grenoble)
    9/16/24, 4:27 PM
    Flash Talk
  18. Timothée Hoffreumon (Université Paris-Saclay)
    9/16/24, 4:34 PM
    Flash Talk
  19. Michael Miller (University of Toronto)
    9/16/24, 4:41 PM
    Flash Talk
  20. Tales Rick Perche (Perimeter Institute)
    9/16/24, 4:48 PM
    Flash Talk
  21. Cyril Branciard (Institut Néel - CNRS)
    9/17/24, 9:00 AM
    Tutorial

    Recent advances in quantum foundations have unveiled the idea that the causal order between quantum events may not always be fixed or even well-defined, allowing for some form of indefinite quantum causality. This tutorial will introduce the key concepts and motivations behind this rapidly developing area of research. Focusing on one of the main frameworks developed to explore indefinite...

    Go to contribution page
  22. Giulio Chiribella (University of Hong Kong)
    9/17/24, 10:50 AM
    Conference Talk

    At the fundamental level, the dynamics of quantum particles and fields is time-symmetric: their dynamical equations are invariant under inversion of the time coordinate, possibly in conjunction with the change of other physical properties, such as charge and parity. At the operational level, the time-symmetry of the fundamental equations implies that certain quantum devices are bidirectional,...

    Go to contribution page
  23. Jessica Bavaresco (University of Geneva)
    9/17/24, 11:30 AM
    Conference Talk

    Higher-order transformations that act on a certain number of input quantum channels with an indefinite causal order, such as the quantum switch, cannot be described by standard quantum circuits that use the same number of calls of the input quantum channels. But could they be simulated, i.e., could their action on their input channels be deterministically reproduced, for all arbitrary inputs,...

    Go to contribution page
  24. Ravi Kunjwal (Aix-Marseille University)
    9/17/24, 1:45 PM
    Contributed Talk
  25. Patrick Fraser (University of Toronto)
    9/17/24, 1:45 PM
    Contributed Talk
  26. Robin Lorenz (Quantinuum)
    9/17/24, 2:10 PM
    Contributed Talk
  27. Zixuan Liu (The University of Hong Kong)
    9/17/24, 2:10 PM
    Contributed Talk
  28. Raphaël Mothe (Institut Néel, CNRS)
    9/17/24, 2:35 PM
    Contributed Talk
  29. Isaac Friend (University of Oxford)
    9/17/24, 2:35 PM
    Contributed Talk
  30. Tein van der Lugt (University of Oxford)
    9/17/24, 3:45 PM
    Contributed Talk
  31. Daan Janssen (University of York)
    9/17/24, 3:45 PM
    Contributed Talk
  32. Joshua Kirklin
    9/17/24, 4:10 PM
    Contributed Talk
  33. Augustin Vanrietvelde (Télécom Paris)
    9/17/24, 4:10 PM
    Contributed Talk
  34. Bob Coecke
    9/17/24, 4:35 PM
    Contributed Talk
  35. Ofek Bengyat (Institute for Quantum Optics and Quantum Information - Vienna)
    9/17/24, 4:35 PM
    Contributed Talk
  36. Sally Shrapnel (University of Queensland)
    9/18/24, 9:00 AM
    Conference Talk

    Given the large number of proposed quantum machine learning (QML) algorithms, it is somewhat surprising that ideas from this field have not yet been extended to causal learning. While deep learning and generative machine learning models have taken centre stage in the industrial application of automated learning on classical data, it is nonetheless well known that these techniques don't...

    Go to contribution page
  37. Huw Price (Trinity College, Cambridge)
    9/18/24, 9:40 AM

    We propose that Bell correlations are explicable as a combination of (i) collider bias and (ii) a boundary constraint on the collider variable. We show that the proposal is valid for a special class of ('W-shaped') Bell experiments involving delayed-choice entanglement swapping, and argue that it can be extended to the ordinary ('V-shaped') case. The proposal requires no direct causal...

    Go to contribution page
  38. Alejandro Pozas-Kerstjens (Université de Genève)
    9/18/24, 10:50 AM
    Conference Talk

    It is not explicitly obvious that relativity and quantum mechanics are consistent with each other. Extensive research has shown that quantum states are consistent with relativity, in that they do not allow for faster-than-light transferring of information. In contrast, much less research has been done in quantum measurements, and in fact, naive attempts to put together relativity and quantum...

    Go to contribution page
  39. Ciarán Gilligan-Lee (Spotify)
    9/18/24, 2:00 PM
    Colloquium

    Causal reasoning is vital for effective reasoning in many domains, from healthcare to economics. In medical diagnosis, for example, a doctor aims to explain a patient’s symptoms by determining the diseases causing them. This is because causal relations, unlike correlations, allow one to reason about the consequences of possible treatments and to answer counterfactual queries. In this talk I...

    Go to contribution page
  40. Daniel Centeno Díaz
    9/18/24, 3:45 PM
    Contributed Talk
  41. Maarten Grothus (Inria Grenoble)
    9/18/24, 3:45 PM
    Contributed Talk
  42. Carla Ferradini (Institute for Theoretical Physics, ETH Zurich)
    9/18/24, 4:10 PM
    Contributed Talk
  43. Hlér Kristjánsson (Perimeter Institute & IQC)
    9/18/24, 4:10 PM
    Contributed Talk
  44. Eric Cavalcanti (Griffith University)
    9/18/24, 4:35 PM
    Contributed Talk
  45. Samuel Fedida (University of Cambridge)
    9/18/24, 4:35 PM
    Contributed Talk
  46. Rainer Verch (University of Leipzig)
    9/19/24, 9:00 AM
    Conference Talk

    There are several non-causal effects that have been attributed to quantum physics. These include the analogues of "closed timelike curve effects" in quantum circuits proposed by David Deutsch (D-CTC), and the "impossible measurements" in relativistic quantum field theory discussed by Raphael Sorkin. Based on previous work, it will be pointed out in the talk that the alleged non-causality...

    Go to contribution page
  47. Sumati Surya (Raman Research Institute)
    9/19/24, 9:40 AM
    Conference Talk

    The notion of causality is intimately tied to both, a transitive ordering on events, and the possibility of unrelated events. Thus, any causality structure is a partially ordered set or poset. This is the case in Lorentzian spacetime, which possesses a single time direction. In causal set quantum gravity, this spacetime causality structure is "first quantised" by discretising it. However,...

    Go to contribution page
  48. Doreen Fraser (University of Waterloo)
    9/19/24, 10:50 AM
    Conference Talk

    In QFT, one aspect of relativistic causality is the principle of microcausality, which requires that observables associated with spacelike separated regions commute. But this principle is not by itself sufficient to rule out superluminal signalling, as examples of ‘impossible’ measurements demonstrate. Representations of the dynamics that respect relativity also play a necessary role in...

    Go to contribution page
  49. Rafael Chaves (International Institute of Physics (IIP-UFRN))
    9/19/24, 11:30 AM
    Conference Talk

    Generalizations of Bell's theorem, particularly within quantum networks, are now being analyzed through the causal inference lens. However, the use of interventions, a central concept in causality theory, remains unexplored. As will be discussed, if we are not limited to observational data and can intervene in our experimental setup, we can witness quantum violations of classical causal bounds...

    Go to contribution page
  50. Jan Głowacki (University of Oxford)
    9/19/24, 3:45 PM
    Contributed Talk
  51. Xiangling Xu (Inria Saclay Île-de-France)
    9/19/24, 3:45 PM
    Contributed Talk
  52. Maria Ciudad Alañón
    9/19/24, 4:10 PM
    Contributed Talk
  53. Wayne Myrvold (University of Western Ontario)
    9/19/24, 4:10 PM
    Contributed Talk
  54. Davide Poderini (International Institute of Physics, UFRN, Natal)
    9/19/24, 4:35 PM
    Contributed Talk
  55. Nesta van der Schaaf (The University of Edinburgh)
    9/19/24, 4:35 PM
    Contributed Talk
  56. 9/19/24, 5:15 PM
    Conference Event
  57. Mio Murao (The University of Tokyo)
    9/20/24, 9:00 AM
    Conference Talk

    Supermaps are higher-order transformations that take maps as input. We explore quantum algorithms that implement supermaps of unitary operations using multiple calls to a black-box unitary operation. We investigate how the causal structure and spacetime symmetry of these unitary black-boxes affect their performance in implementing higher-order quantum operations. We analyze several tasks,...

    Go to contribution page
  58. Tein van der Lugt (University of Oxford)
    9/20/24, 9:40 AM
    Conference Talk

    Multipartite quantum channels realisable in a spacetime obey the no-superluminal-signalling constraints imposed by relativistic causality. But what about the converse: Can every channel that exhibits no superluminal signalling also be realised through relativistically valid dynamics? To our knowledge, only special cases of this question have been studied. For bipartite channels, the answer has...

    Go to contribution page
  59. Anne-Catherine de la Hamette (University of Vienna / IQOQI Vienna)
    9/20/24, 10:50 AM
    Conference Talk

    Recent research on quantum reference frames (QRFs) has shown that whether a system is in a superposed state of locations, momenta, and other properties can depend on the quantum reference frame relative to which it is being described. Whether an event is localized in spacetime or not can change under QRF transformations, in that case so-called quantum-controlled diffeomorphisms. This raises a...

    Go to contribution page
  60. Renato Renner (ETH Zurich)
    9/20/24, 11:30 AM
    Conference Talk

    Causality is a core concept in both General Relativity (GR) and Quantum Information Theory (QIT), yet it manifests differently in each domain. In GR, causal cones appear as a defining property of spacetime. Conversely, in QIT, causality relates to the abstract flow of information in quantum processes, independent of spacetime. This raises a crucial question: under what conditions can an...

    Go to contribution page
  61. Matthias Salzger (ICTQT, University of Gdansk)
    9/20/24, 3:45 PM
    Contributed Talk
  62. Pedro Lauand (University of Campinas)
    9/20/24, 3:45 PM
    Contributed Talk
  63. Maarten Grothus (Inria Grenoble)
    9/20/24, 4:10 PM
    Contributed Talk
  64. Tamás Kriváchy (ICFO, The Institute of Photonic Sciences (Barcelona))
    9/20/24, 4:10 PM
    Contributed Talk
  65. 9/20/24, 4:35 PM
    Conference Event