-
9/16/24, 9:00 AMConference Event
-
Robert Spekkens (Perimeter Institute)9/16/24, 9:20 AMTutorial
Can the effectiveness of a medical treatment be determined without the expense of a randomized controlled trial? Can the impact of a new policy be disentangled from other factors that happen to vary at the same time? Questions such as these are the purview of the field of causal inference, a general-purpose science of cause and effect, applicable in domains ranging from epidemiology to...
Go to contribution page -
Thomas Richardson (University of Washington)9/16/24, 10:50 AMConference Talk
In the Statistics literature there are three main frameworks for causal modeling: counterfactuals (aka potential outcomes), non-parametric structural equation models (NPSEMs) and graphs (aka path diagrams or causal Bayes nets). These approaches are similar and, in certain specific respects, equivalent. However, there are important conceptual differences and each formulation has its own...
Go to contribution page -
Joris M. Mooij (University of Amsterdam)9/16/24, 11:30 AMConference Talk
Based on the immense popularity of causal Bayesian networks and structural causal models, one might expect that these representations are appropriate to describe the causal semantics of any real-world system, at least in principle. In this talk, I will argue that this is not the case, and motivate the study of more general causal modeling frameworks. In particular, I will discuss bipartite...
Go to contribution page -
Leihao Chen (University of Amsterdam, Korteweg-de Vries Institute for Mathematics)9/16/24, 1:45 PMContributed Talk
-
Yìlè Yīng (Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics)9/16/24, 1:45 PMContributed Talk
-
V. Vilasini (ETH Zürich and Inria University Grenoble Alpes)9/16/24, 2:10 PMContributed Talk
-
Trung Phung (Johns Hopkins Whiting School of Engineering)9/16/24, 2:10 PMContributed Talk
-
Nick Ormrod (University of Oxford)9/16/24, 2:35 PMContributed Talk
-
Shashaank Khanna (University of York)9/16/24, 2:35 PMContributed Talk
-
Pablo Arrighi (Université Paris-Sarclay and Inria)9/16/24, 3:45 PMFlash Talk
-
Victor Gitton (ETH Zurich)9/16/24, 3:52 PMFlash Talk
-
Julian Wechs (Université Libre de Bruxelles)9/16/24, 3:59 PMFlash Talk
-
Ryszard Paweł Kostecki (University of Gdańsk)9/16/24, 4:06 PMFlash Talk
-
Marina Maciel Ansanelli (Perimeter Institute)9/16/24, 4:13 PMFlash Talk
-
Charles Alexandre Bédard (Università della Svizzera Italiana)9/16/24, 4:20 PMFlash Talk
-
Alastair Abbott (Inria Grenoble)9/16/24, 4:27 PMFlash Talk
-
Timothée Hoffreumon (Université Paris-Saclay)9/16/24, 4:34 PMFlash Talk
-
Michael Miller (University of Toronto)9/16/24, 4:41 PMFlash Talk
-
Tales Rick Perche (Perimeter Institute)9/16/24, 4:48 PMFlash Talk
-
Cyril Branciard (Institut Néel - CNRS)9/17/24, 9:00 AMTutorial
Recent advances in quantum foundations have unveiled the idea that the causal order between quantum events may not always be fixed or even well-defined, allowing for some form of indefinite quantum causality. This tutorial will introduce the key concepts and motivations behind this rapidly developing area of research. Focusing on one of the main frameworks developed to explore indefinite...
Go to contribution page -
Giulio Chiribella (University of Hong Kong)9/17/24, 10:50 AMConference Talk
At the fundamental level, the dynamics of quantum particles and fields is time-symmetric: their dynamical equations are invariant under inversion of the time coordinate, possibly in conjunction with the change of other physical properties, such as charge and parity. At the operational level, the time-symmetry of the fundamental equations implies that certain quantum devices are bidirectional,...
Go to contribution page -
Jessica Bavaresco (University of Geneva)9/17/24, 11:30 AMConference Talk
Higher-order transformations that act on a certain number of input quantum channels with an indefinite causal order, such as the quantum switch, cannot be described by standard quantum circuits that use the same number of calls of the input quantum channels. But could they be simulated, i.e., could their action on their input channels be deterministically reproduced, for all arbitrary inputs,...
Go to contribution page -
Ravi Kunjwal (Aix-Marseille University)9/17/24, 1:45 PMContributed Talk
-
Patrick Fraser (University of Toronto)9/17/24, 1:45 PMContributed Talk
-
Robin Lorenz (Quantinuum)9/17/24, 2:10 PMContributed Talk
-
Zixuan Liu (The University of Hong Kong)9/17/24, 2:10 PMContributed Talk
-
Raphaël Mothe (Institut Néel, CNRS)9/17/24, 2:35 PMContributed Talk
-
Isaac Friend (University of Oxford)9/17/24, 2:35 PMContributed Talk
-
Tein van der Lugt (University of Oxford)9/17/24, 3:45 PMContributed Talk
-
Daan Janssen (University of York)9/17/24, 3:45 PMContributed Talk
-
Joshua Kirklin9/17/24, 4:10 PMContributed Talk
-
Augustin Vanrietvelde (Télécom Paris)9/17/24, 4:10 PMContributed Talk
-
Bob Coecke9/17/24, 4:35 PMContributed Talk
-
Ofek Bengyat (Institute for Quantum Optics and Quantum Information - Vienna)9/17/24, 4:35 PMContributed Talk
-
Sally Shrapnel (University of Queensland)9/18/24, 9:00 AMConference Talk
Given the large number of proposed quantum machine learning (QML) algorithms, it is somewhat surprising that ideas from this field have not yet been extended to causal learning. While deep learning and generative machine learning models have taken centre stage in the industrial application of automated learning on classical data, it is nonetheless well known that these techniques don't...
Go to contribution page -
Huw Price (Trinity College, Cambridge)9/18/24, 9:40 AM
We propose that Bell correlations are explicable as a combination of (i) collider bias and (ii) a boundary constraint on the collider variable. We show that the proposal is valid for a special class of ('W-shaped') Bell experiments involving delayed-choice entanglement swapping, and argue that it can be extended to the ordinary ('V-shaped') case. The proposal requires no direct causal...
Go to contribution page -
Alejandro Pozas-Kerstjens (Université de Genève)9/18/24, 10:50 AMConference Talk
It is not explicitly obvious that relativity and quantum mechanics are consistent with each other. Extensive research has shown that quantum states are consistent with relativity, in that they do not allow for faster-than-light transferring of information. In contrast, much less research has been done in quantum measurements, and in fact, naive attempts to put together relativity and quantum...
Go to contribution page -
Ciarán Gilligan-Lee (Spotify)9/18/24, 2:00 PMColloquium
Causal reasoning is vital for effective reasoning in many domains, from healthcare to economics. In medical diagnosis, for example, a doctor aims to explain a patient’s symptoms by determining the diseases causing them. This is because causal relations, unlike correlations, allow one to reason about the consequences of possible treatments and to answer counterfactual queries. In this talk I...
Go to contribution page -
Daniel Centeno Díaz9/18/24, 3:45 PMContributed Talk
-
Maarten Grothus (Inria Grenoble)9/18/24, 3:45 PMContributed Talk
-
Carla Ferradini (Institute for Theoretical Physics, ETH Zurich)9/18/24, 4:10 PMContributed Talk
-
Hlér Kristjánsson (Perimeter Institute & IQC)9/18/24, 4:10 PMContributed Talk
-
Eric Cavalcanti (Griffith University)9/18/24, 4:35 PMContributed Talk
-
Samuel Fedida (University of Cambridge)9/18/24, 4:35 PMContributed Talk
-
Rainer Verch (University of Leipzig)9/19/24, 9:00 AMConference Talk
There are several non-causal effects that have been attributed to quantum physics. These include the analogues of "closed timelike curve effects" in quantum circuits proposed by David Deutsch (D-CTC), and the "impossible measurements" in relativistic quantum field theory discussed by Raphael Sorkin. Based on previous work, it will be pointed out in the talk that the alleged non-causality...
Go to contribution page -
Sumati Surya (Raman Research Institute)9/19/24, 9:40 AMConference Talk
The notion of causality is intimately tied to both, a transitive ordering on events, and the possibility of unrelated events. Thus, any causality structure is a partially ordered set or poset. This is the case in Lorentzian spacetime, which possesses a single time direction. In causal set quantum gravity, this spacetime causality structure is "first quantised" by discretising it. However,...
Go to contribution page -
Doreen Fraser (University of Waterloo)9/19/24, 10:50 AMConference Talk
In QFT, one aspect of relativistic causality is the principle of microcausality, which requires that observables associated with spacelike separated regions commute. But this principle is not by itself sufficient to rule out superluminal signalling, as examples of ‘impossible’ measurements demonstrate. Representations of the dynamics that respect relativity also play a necessary role in...
Go to contribution page -
Rafael Chaves (International Institute of Physics (IIP-UFRN))9/19/24, 11:30 AMConference Talk
Generalizations of Bell's theorem, particularly within quantum networks, are now being analyzed through the causal inference lens. However, the use of interventions, a central concept in causality theory, remains unexplored. As will be discussed, if we are not limited to observational data and can intervene in our experimental setup, we can witness quantum violations of classical causal bounds...
Go to contribution page -
Jan Głowacki (University of Oxford)9/19/24, 3:45 PMContributed Talk
-
Xiangling Xu (Inria Saclay Île-de-France)9/19/24, 3:45 PMContributed Talk
-
Maria Ciudad Alañón9/19/24, 4:10 PMContributed Talk
-
Wayne Myrvold (University of Western Ontario)9/19/24, 4:10 PMContributed Talk
-
Davide Poderini (International Institute of Physics, UFRN, Natal)9/19/24, 4:35 PMContributed Talk
-
Nesta van der Schaaf (The University of Edinburgh)9/19/24, 4:35 PMContributed Talk
-
9/19/24, 5:15 PMConference Event
-
Mio Murao (The University of Tokyo)9/20/24, 9:00 AMConference Talk
Supermaps are higher-order transformations that take maps as input. We explore quantum algorithms that implement supermaps of unitary operations using multiple calls to a black-box unitary operation. We investigate how the causal structure and spacetime symmetry of these unitary black-boxes affect their performance in implementing higher-order quantum operations. We analyze several tasks,...
Go to contribution page -
Tein van der Lugt (University of Oxford)9/20/24, 9:40 AMConference Talk
Multipartite quantum channels realisable in a spacetime obey the no-superluminal-signalling constraints imposed by relativistic causality. But what about the converse: Can every channel that exhibits no superluminal signalling also be realised through relativistically valid dynamics? To our knowledge, only special cases of this question have been studied. For bipartite channels, the answer has...
Go to contribution page -
Anne-Catherine de la Hamette (University of Vienna / IQOQI Vienna)9/20/24, 10:50 AMConference Talk
Recent research on quantum reference frames (QRFs) has shown that whether a system is in a superposed state of locations, momenta, and other properties can depend on the quantum reference frame relative to which it is being described. Whether an event is localized in spacetime or not can change under QRF transformations, in that case so-called quantum-controlled diffeomorphisms. This raises a...
Go to contribution page -
Renato Renner (ETH Zurich)9/20/24, 11:30 AMConference Talk
Causality is a core concept in both General Relativity (GR) and Quantum Information Theory (QIT), yet it manifests differently in each domain. In GR, causal cones appear as a defining property of spacetime. Conversely, in QIT, causality relates to the abstract flow of information in quantum processes, independent of spacetime. This raises a crucial question: under what conditions can an...
Go to contribution page -
Matthias Salzger (ICTQT, University of Gdansk)9/20/24, 3:45 PMContributed Talk
-
Pedro Lauand (University of Campinas)9/20/24, 3:45 PMContributed Talk
-
Maarten Grothus (Inria Grenoble)9/20/24, 4:10 PMContributed Talk
-
Tamás Kriváchy (ICFO, The Institute of Photonic Sciences (Barcelona))9/20/24, 4:10 PMContributed Talk
-
9/20/24, 4:35 PMConference Event
Choose timezone
Your profile timezone: